Halverson saga drags on with fewer charges
OK – so some charges were dropped, and the hearing continues today on the remainder. If there is no time for closing arguments today, then the final arguments will be briefed.
That could take awhile. And so it goes.
At some point, this story just got old to me. And pointless. The contest ancillary arguments, the media sideshow, and the mean-spirited jokes transformed what could have been a serious issue involving judicial competence into a tabloid event. Frankly, I lost interest.
The judicial disciplinary process has taken so long that it has very nearly been mooted by the election process. Since Halverson was not among the top two finishers in the primary, her term of service does have a clear end, regardless of the outcome here. The few months remaining in Halverson’s term are all that is at stake now.
What has been lost in this story is the impact on litigants with cases in Dept. 23. Those cases have been handled by senior judges. That service is important and I am not knocking the judges who have stepped in to help during this difficult time. But strategy in a case often involves taking the temperment/attitude/viewpoint of the judge assigned in the case into consideration. That ability has been hampered in Dept. 23 while this matter has lingered.
Fortunately, thanks to the election, there IS an end in sight. This is the first time I’ve been grateful for the judicial election process.
For those who care, the charges that were dropped were creation of a hostile work environment, improperly contacting a Family Court hearing master and failing to explain written order procedures to her clerks.
See the RJ article: Some Halverson charges dismissed
